Every care team knows the moment: a patient who should not be walking alone gets up at night, and nobody is in the room. Most of the tools meant to help either depend on the patient (a pendant they forget, a wristband they remove) or depend on watching them (a camera feed that someone has to monitor and that families often reject).
When patients and families refuse monitoring, the room goes back to being unprotected. That is why privacy is not a nice extra in fall prevention. It decides whether the technology gets switched on at all.
What patients and families tell us
[Add two or three short, permission-approved quotes or observations from your discovery interviews with nurses, patients or families.]
Designing for dignity
We started Inspikta with a simple rule: our devices never create images of people. There is no video to store, leak or watch. The sensor responds to motion, recognises a fall, and alerts staff in seconds.
If a sensor cannot see a face, it cannot expose one.
That rule shapes everything else, from where the intelligence runs (on the device, not in the cloud) to how a nurse receives the alert. It also makes conversations with privacy officers much shorter.
What comes next
We are inviting Canadian hospitals and long-term care homes to join our pilot program. If your team is looking at fall prevention, we would like to hear what you need.